![]() The FTP Site Boneyard is a collection of various FTP sites from around the internet, gathering what were once the dominant form of file transfer online but which have fallen to the wayside in favor of other update servers and cloud-based storage. The collection contains shareware, freeware, and demo programs, all DOS or Windows-based. The DEMU collection is a curated collection hosting over 4,000 classic PC-based games from a quarter century. CDR files, as well as browsed online through the Internet Archive's file listing interface. Most of these CD-ROMs can be downloaded as. Other CD-ROMs include images and digitized music, documentation sets and game modifications. With over 2,500 discs now hosted, the archive allows access to a wide range of historical collections, including curations by defunct groups like Walnut Creek and Linux/Unix distributions of the past. The CD Archive collects thousands of Shareware and Cover CD-ROMs from the heyday of the CD-ROM (late 1980s to mid 2000s) and provides ISO images as well as links inside these collections of software. In addition to this, the project also catalogs other computing and gaming resources such as software and hardware manuals, magazine scans and computing catalogs. The goal of the TOSEC project is to maintain a database of all software and firmware images for all microcomputers, minicomputers and video game consoles. The project has identified and cataloged over 450,000 different software images/sets, consisting of over 3.60TB of software, firmware and resources. TOSEC catalogs over 200 unique computing platforms and continues to grow. The main goal of the project is to catalog and audit various kinds of software and firmware images for these systems. The Old School Emulation Center (TOSEC) is a retrocomputing initiative dedicated to the cataloging and preservation of software, firmware and resources for microcomputers, minicomputers and video game consoles. The collection includes a broad range of software related materials including shareware, freeware, video news releases about software titles, speed runs of actual software game play, previews and promos for software games, high-score and skill replays of various game genres, and the art of filmmaking with real-time computer game engines. I'm sure the Draken had a lower RCS than any Phantom variant.DESCRIPTION The Internet Archive Software Collection is the largest vintage and historical software library in the world, providing instant access to millions of programs, CD-ROM images, documentation and multimedia. But many times they flew with the E or E2. The F-4J/S/N/E and even ANG D models were F capable. Remember, it was USN F-4J's in 1975 that were the first jets to test the Skyflash at NAS Pt. I believe it may have been more reliable. However, the Skyflash was a good missile too. It had more(technically) range than the Skyflash. The Aim-7F was a good missile, better than the E or E2. Even by 1988 a VMFA-321 RIO (at an airshow) would not let anyone into his office, he said "there was classified stuff back there". Was it as good as the PD sets in the subsequent teen series?. CDR Chesire (USN Phantom and Tomcat aviator) and a USMC Phantom pilot (from VMFA-321) both told me that the AWG-10B (in the F-4S) was a very good PD radar. No, I doubt the F-4J/S had an equivalent or superior radar to the Viggen. The Phantom was a beast, and MD sold over 5,000 of them for a reason. The Saab Draken had beautiful lines, and it was far ahead of its time. Only the F-4E/F had a gun, I think all Draken models did. The Aim-7F was far better than any Falcon variant. Later Drakens may have had a PD fire control radar still has a much smaller dish. The Pulse only birds would have to be below the Saab jet in order to avoid any ground clutter but they probably still have an absolute range advantage. The Pulse Doppler Phantoms would have the advantage BVR. STR and radius "could" be a different story. Even the earlier F-4's (lighter B model) most likely have an energy advantage against the Draken. STR, T/W, anything in the vertical i'm sure the slatted Phantoms have the advantage. The Draken (like nearly all deltas) bleeds energy in a sustained turn. I am not an expert on the Draken, but I do know that it has a superb ITR, probably much better than any Phantom. WVR or BVR? Which Phantoms are you comparing the Draken to, the slatted or hardwing F-4? Pulse Doppler F-4J/S/K/M or the pulse only Phantoms (B/C/D/E/N)? Phantoms with the Aim-7E/E2/ or F? ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |